Sources: W3C Web & TV Archive (2011), Tor Browser Spec (2014), HTML Living Standard, IETF CHIPS Draft.
1. Cross-Origin State Isolation Sandbox
Modern browser security models diverge sharply on how they constrain cross-origin navigation residue, credentialed Fetch preflights, and embedded frame storage. Select a browser isolation profile, a communication channel, and an attack vector below to inspect the exact partition key, window.name lifetime rule, and normative mitigation header.
Interactive State & Channel Isolation Matrix
Client-Side Deterministic Model · 0 Telemetry
2. Protocol Matrix: Tor FPI vs. Chrome CHIPS vs. Capability URLs
Browser privacy architectures solve cross-origin tracking through three distinct mechanisms: strict first-party keying (Tor Browser), explicit partitioned cookie/storage tuples (Chrome CHIPS), and ambient-free capability delegation (Web-Send Introducers). While Tor FPI and CHIPS modify user-agent storage keying, Capability URLs remove ambient credentials from the transport layer altogether so even unpartitioned origins cannot correlate third-party actions.
| Security / Privacy Property | Tor First-Party Isolation (FPI) | Chrome CHIPS & Storage Partitioning | Web-Send / Capability URLs |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary Partition Key | firstPartyDomain (top-level eTLD+1) |
(top-level site, frame site) tuple |
Stateless unguessable URI #fragment secret |
window.name Navigation Reset |
CLEARED Reset on every cross-origin navigation | GROUP-BOUND Reset when BrowsingContextGroup swaps | NOT USED State passes via postMessage or fragment |
| Third-Party Cookie Scope | Blocked / strictly isolated per first-party tab | Allowed only with SameSite=None; Secure; Partitioned |
Zero third-party cookies required (ambient-free) |
| Clickstream Privacy | PRESERVED No cross-site script linkability | PARTIAL Per-site jar blocks join; IP remains visible | PRESERVED Provider contacted only on user click |
| UI Redress / Clickjacking | Standard CSP frame-ancestors & NoScript |
CSP frame-ancestors + COOP: same-origin |
Full-size top-level Trusted Path window mandated |
| Ambient Authority / CSRF | Reduced via third-party cookie suppression | Mitigated for partitioned third-party frames | ELIMINATED Authority bound solely to explicit key |
| Cross-Origin Discovery | Disabled for external local-network probing | Local Network Access / Web Share API | User-registered local or remote Introducer registry |
3. Cross-Origin State Partitioning Architecture
Before storage partitioning and window.name isolation, an embedded third-party origin (tracker.invalid) loaded under two unrelated publishers shared a single global cookie jar, HTTP cache, and tab-scoped window.name string. Under modern origin isolation, every storage API and navigation boundary resolves against the top-level site tuple, while Web-Send's capability model isolates the user's chosen service inside a clean top-level or user-mediated channel.
4. Methodology, Primary Sources & Citation Corpus
Between 2010 and 2014, web-send.org published the original Web Introducer specification authored by engineers from Google, Sony Ericsson, and Mozilla Labs. Those documents established a formal bridge between object-capability security and browser privacy engineering, earning direct citations across four enduring technical records:
- W3C Web & TV Interest Group (April 2011): Dave Raggett referenced
web-send.org/introducer/onpublic-web-and-tvas a mechanism for exposing local consumer-electronics discovery protocols to web scripts without cross-origin ambient leakage. - Tor Browser Design & Specification (2014): In the Tor Browser Spec (
tor-commitsandtor-dev), Tor developers cited Web-Send Introducers under Promising Standards right beside their analysis ofwindow.namecross-origin identifier tracking. - UC Berkeley Law BCLT Privacy Symposium: Frederick Hirsch's presentation on Technology Standardization and Privacy documented Web-Send alongside W3C privacy standardization efforts, archived in our Berkeley BCLT Trace.
- QCon San Francisco 2010: Tyler Close's lecture Adding Features to the Web Securely connected Waterken Capability URLs directly to the Bookmark Introducer protocol preserved at
/bookmark-protocol/.
5. Specification FAQ
Why did Tor Browser cite web-send.org alongside window.name isolation?
Reference: Tor Browser Spec April 2014 commit msg01829 & features.html scorecard.
How does Tor First-Party Isolation differ from Chrome CHIPS storage partitioning?
Reference: IETF CHIPS specification & Tor Browser First-Party Isolation design doc.
6. Restored 2010 Root Entry Context
Historical Root Snapshot (2010-12-28): Web Introducer Overview
The original 2010 front page of web-send.org introduced the Web Introducer specification with direct links to /introducer/, /bookmark, and /features.html, defining how web content discovers user-owned personal resources across origins via one-click user mediation. All legacy technical paths resolve with zero redirect chains to their restored specifications on this archive.